Traveltalkonline.com Forums

.


SXM Cruise Schedule TTOL Sponsors SXM Travel Calendar
Forum Statistics
Forums39
Topics40,032
Posts324,928
Members26,769
Most Online4,031
Dec 15th, 2024
Top Posters(30 Days)
RonDon 60
kim 31
jazzgal 26
Manpot 24
Kennys 23
Member Spotlight
pony600
pony600
CT
Posts: 1,370
Joined: June 2008
Today's Birthdays
Sunshinesxm
Who's Online Now
4 members (ggffrr11, 3 invisible), 1,089 guests, and 40 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 698
Likes: 2
F
Traveler
OP Offline
Traveler
F
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 698
Likes: 2
https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/odds-catching-covid-19-flight-wellness-scn/index.html

Interesting finding. Selfishly I hope there’s still enough doubters out there that this doesn’t ruin my cheap airline ticket to SXM.

SXM Sponsors
.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,076
Likes: 17
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,076
Likes: 17
Personally, I would agree with the article. Planes have to be cleaner now than ever, throw in the reduced # of passengers and the strict requirements to even board the plane, I would not hesitate to fly. Many studies show the air filtration/circulation system onboard aircraft does an excellent job.
Like you, setting on reasonable airfare for Nov. but not really having a good feeling it is going to happen.


J.D.
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 681
J
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
J
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 681
Interesting to look at the numbers
Article says odds of catching based on 2 hour domestic flight is 1/4300 for a full flight and 1/7700 with empty middle rows. Odds rise with longer flights – no odds noted for that scenario

I cannot comment on the science behind those numbers and if the numbers are only for the air flight or include any airport interaction
However based on US population [330 million] and published current daily cases [40,000], odds with just staying put are on average 1/8300.

I think that means a longer haul flight with some middle seats used, would have maybe the same potential as staying home
At least not worse if flying – if the article’s science holds up.

J&B

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 61
Likes: 1
M
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
M
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 61
Likes: 1
I was excited about this until I read the entire article. At the end Dr. Barnett, the statistician from MIT, said he wouldn't fly right now because he is 72 and, because of his age and gender, is at higher risk for covid. So am I. boohoo

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 298
D
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
D
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 298
This is an example of pseudoscientific BS. The learned professor calculates and cogitates and concludes that the odds are very small....in fact minute. BUT he would not fly now because......WTF. Looks like he does not believe his own analysis. Pure unadulterated BS. It's fine to not believe your analysis but it is not fine to not believe your analysis and then publish it. The man should lose his job.

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 636
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 636
Wait a minute, because his risk tolerance level is the not the same as yours you’re dismissing his analysis. The very analysis you used to basically dismiss the risk in question?

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 435
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 435
Having just flown 3 times in August, it’s still safer than driving.

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,383
Likes: 22
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,383
Likes: 22
This is one of those arguments which has nothing to do with SXM and which no one can convince someone else of their position, so will close this one here.


Carol Hill

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5