|
Forums39
Topics40,032
Posts324,928
Members26,769
|
Most Online4,031 Dec 15th, 2024
|
|
Posts: 1,370
Joined: June 2008
|
|
4 members (ggffrr11, 3 invisible),
1,089
guests, and
40
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
.
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,076 Likes: 17
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,076 Likes: 17 |
Personally, I would agree with the article. Planes have to be cleaner now than ever, throw in the reduced # of passengers and the strict requirements to even board the plane, I would not hesitate to fly. Many studies show the air filtration/circulation system onboard aircraft does an excellent job. Like you, setting on reasonable airfare for Nov. but not really having a good feeling it is going to happen.
J.D.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 681
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 681 |
Interesting to look at the numbers Article says odds of catching based on 2 hour domestic flight is 1/4300 for a full flight and 1/7700 with empty middle rows. Odds rise with longer flights – no odds noted for that scenario
I cannot comment on the science behind those numbers and if the numbers are only for the air flight or include any airport interaction However based on US population [330 million] and published current daily cases [40,000], odds with just staying put are on average 1/8300.
I think that means a longer haul flight with some middle seats used, would have maybe the same potential as staying home At least not worse if flying – if the article’s science holds up.
J&B
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 61 Likes: 1
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 61 Likes: 1 |
I was excited about this until I read the entire article. At the end Dr. Barnett, the statistician from MIT, said he wouldn't fly right now because he is 72 and, because of his age and gender, is at higher risk for covid. So am I. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 298
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 298 |
This is an example of pseudoscientific BS. The learned professor calculates and cogitates and concludes that the odds are very small....in fact minute. BUT he would not fly now because......WTF. Looks like he does not believe his own analysis. Pure unadulterated BS. It's fine to not believe your analysis but it is not fine to not believe your analysis and then publish it. The man should lose his job.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 636
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 636 |
Wait a minute, because his risk tolerance level is the not the same as yours you’re dismissing his analysis. The very analysis you used to basically dismiss the risk in question?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 435
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 435 |
Having just flown 3 times in August, it’s still safer than driving.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,383 Likes: 22
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,383 Likes: 22 |
This is one of those arguments which has nothing to do with SXM and which no one can convince someone else of their position, so will close this one here.
Carol Hill
|
|
|
|
|
|