|
Forums39
Topics39,575
Posts320,986
Members26,686
| |
Most Online4,031
Dec 15th, 2024
|
|
|
Posts: 123
Joined: September 2003
|
|
|
13 members (Kiles41, SXMScubaman, CLIFFTOPS, Todd_Melinda_K, SANFILIP, VT_SXM, JandIrene, sxmpete, xrayman67, 4 invisible),
467
guests, and
39
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 694
Traveler
|
OP
Traveler
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 694 |
price was at my acceptable level so we booked United direct flight EWR - SXM late February 2020 for just under $400 with most restrictions. Yes the list of restrictions is growing too. BTW midweek
|
|
|
 .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,081
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,081 |
We're also looking at United from EWR (post Thanksgiving through 1st 2 weeks in Dec.) and for a 2 week stay Sat. prices are the best. But the basic economy seems too risky. Last year it was $357 on the Sun. after Thanksgiving.
I'm going where the weather suits my clothes.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,003 Likes: 4
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,003 Likes: 4 |
Basic economy seems too risky? What do you mean by risky? Just pay more to get a seat assigned and/or to check bags.
Carol Hill
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,081
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,081 |
Actually, that's what I meant. We want our carry-ons Luggage does get and has gotten delayed. For instance one of the flights we're considering is $440 basic/$500 enhanced. That extra $60 pp is worth it to ensure that we get to sit together. And if overbooked, and if no volunteers, guess who gets bumped. That is risky.
I'm going where the weather suits my clothes.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,003 Likes: 4
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,003 Likes: 4 |
OK, I definitely would pay extra for seat assignments also.
Carol Hill
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 835
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 835 |
I've been checking for March of 2020 out of Detroit. {rices for economy are well over $1,000. so far.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 234
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 234 |
WOW FINALLY ! UNITED WILL BACK ON BOARD WITH ALMOST DAILY FLIGHTS ?? ... 
lina and piggy
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,081
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,081 |
I've noticed that many flights that were previously listed are now "not available". I'm thinking that possibly they were originally on a Max. But it wouldn't be unusual for me to be wrong.
I'm going where the weather suits my clothes.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,003 Likes: 4
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,003 Likes: 4 |
I read this morning that supposedly the FAA may approve the Max to fly again relatively soon. The airlines are stuck with those planes and they can't just dump them, so they will be flying again sooner or later. ...although the thought of flying on one doesn't give me a warm fuzzy right now though.
Carol Hill
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,197
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,197 |
I just read that the 737 Max 8 may not fly again till next year. They have found several others problems and even the design is not deemed to be safe. Hope your FAA does not approve them too soon.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,003 Likes: 4
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,003 Likes: 4 |
Carol Hill
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,197
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,197 |
It says that Canada and Europe would bring back the aircraft on their own terms and not that of the FAA. They are going to do their own safety certification and I doubt if any of those planes will be in the air in June. Perhaps the USA will certify them as early as that, but hopefully the FAA will take their time and do the job right as they should not have been certified in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
.
