|
|
|
Forums39
Topics40,582
Posts329,203
Members26,910
| |
Most Online4,031
Dec 15th, 2024
|
|
|
Posts: 250
Joined: June 2019
|
|
|
9 members (RickG, boucharda, SURICK, jazzgal, extreme, CaroleS, George1234, 2 invisible),
313
guests, and
60
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 772
Traveler
|
OP
Traveler
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 772 |
 Since Irma what side the Dutch or French have there act together. What side 's planning[code enforcement] to avoid destruction is talking hold? How about fraud which side is playing by the rules? Have the Insurance companies mostly paid up??????
|
|
|
 .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,247 Likes: 26
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,247 Likes: 26 |
Based solely upon what I have read, without a doubt the Dutch side is far ahead of the French side. I doubt either side is playing 100% by the rules but it seems the French side does more enforcement of the rules. Even with the controversy with the Dutch side and associated funds to rebuild and the corrupt politics, they seem to be getting more done.
As far as insurance, I would imagine most is paid off with the exception of anything being litigated. From what some business owners posted after Irma, they did not carry insurance.
You also have the saga of Diamond Resorts (Flamingo and Royal Palm) taking much longer than any other resort that is rebuilding.
I will see for myself in 4 weeks.
J.D.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 472 Likes: 2
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 472 Likes: 2 |
Just back from 3 weeks at the Royal Islander - Dutch side much more advanced. I can't comment on code enforcement, fraud or corruption.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
