Traveltalkonline.com Forums

.


SXM Cruise Schedule TTOL Sponsors SXM Travel Calendar
Forum Statistics
Forums39
Topics40,277
Posts326,613
Members26,829
Most Online4,031
Dec 15th, 2024
Top Posters(30 Days)
RonDon 45
fabila 29
jazzgal 21
kim 16
Member Spotlight
gomer36
gomer36
Lake Orion, MI
Posts: 306
Joined: August 2003
Today's Birthdays
beach_dhays, Cobalt, HikeNYCParks, KVR, Twanger
Who's Online Now
4 members (JohnW, Don_and_Linda, 2 invisible), 519 guests, and 53 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,622
Likes: 38
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,622
Likes: 38
I don't know, I guess it would be set to deliver a mild shock, but then GEBE kicks in, with their power surges.. Now, wouldn't that be fun, 'tourist seriously injured in power surge from airport fence..' Or, even more likely, it's out half the time, when the electric is off.


Carol Hill
SXM Sponsors
.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,155
Likes: 21
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,155
Likes: 21
With the unreliability of GEBE, I would think a back-up generator would be in order. I would also think an electric fence could easily be disabled and would be out of service many times. They (electric fences) work well for livestock but they (the livestock) are probably smarter than some of the humans this fence would be protecting.

Personally, I don't have a problem with electric, barbed wire or even razor wire but there is only so much than can be done to protect people from themselves and the chances they take.

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,199
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,199
I love the idea of an electric fence. The next day you would have multiple vendors selling rubber gloves.

Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 104
C
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
C
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 104
I'm no "Rocket Scientist", it just seems SO much simpler than rerouting traffic, etc. And again, sadly, you can only protect people so much from themselves.

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,622
Likes: 38
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,622
Likes: 38
There are probably a hundred things that make more sense than closing that road altogether. Hopefully someone with some common sense will prevail in this situation.


Carol Hill
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,562
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,562
I am not a "Rocket Scientist" by any means, but how about something as simple as Jet blast deflectors? Seems an easier solution than re routing the roads around the airport.


Rick and Grace
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,622
Likes: 38
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,622
Likes: 38
Not sure whether I have posted this here before, but if I have, forgive me. I talked to a pilot friend and he said that, as far as landing, per se, jet blast deflectors would not be a problem. However, he wasn't sure whether they would interfere with the instrument landing system.


Carol Hill
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,562
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,562
If they are not in use it would have to be something like that. It just seems like a No Brainer Solution.


Rick and Grace
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,606
Likes: 5
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,606
Likes: 5
Oh dear! Funny, but not really! You bring up a very good point.....

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,278
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,278
Quote
Carol_Hill said:
I don't know, I guess it would be set to deliver a mild shock, but then GEBE kicks in, with their power surges.. Now, wouldn't that be fun, 'tourist seriously injured in power surge from airport fence..' Or, even more likely, it's out half the time, when the electric is off.


Birds landing on the fence...zap zap zap <img src="http://www.traveltalkonline.com/forums/images/graemlins/Yikes.gif" alt="" />


"It is good to do nothing all day, and then to rest" wink
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 222
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 222
The electric fence idea would probably be pretty entertaining. Although it would probably cause some new problems.....

I remember growing up in the country and we could always talk one of our "City Folk" cousins into a bet of who could pee over the fence. Entertaining for us, not so much for them.......LOL

Bottom line for me is that none of us are perfect. I feel very bad for Gayleen McEwan and her family. We all do things we probably shouldn't for some type of enjoyment. Maybe it is driving too fast, eating that second piece of pie, having that extra drink, or holding on to the fence. My heart goes out to the family. I'm sure Mom, Wife, Sister, Grandma, Friend, etc. will be deeply missed!

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 231
Traveler
Offline
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 231
It seems everyone can empathize with what this family has had to go through. Beyond imaginable. Just a nightmare

The setup at the Sunset is unique and makes SXM an attraction like no other place. The area is a bit landlocked making a change in the road a very challenging and expensive proposition. A risk is taken by the thrill seekers who grasp the fence and a tragedy is bound to occur as years pass. Thousands have enjoyed the SXM thrill be it holding the fence of standing in the blast and having their hat blown into the sea. Motorcycle riders take the risk every time they ride without a helmet and there are countless other examples. It is not the fault of St. Martin, it is the result of the poor decision by the individual. The area should be left alone and perhaps more graphic warnings put up in the area. Even a policeman forbidding the practice of holding the fence beats the huge cost of redirecting the traffic.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5