|
Forums39
Topics40,254
Posts326,425
Members26,825
|
Most Online4,031 Dec 15th, 2024
|
|
Posts: 435
Joined: November 2015
|
|
0 members (),
344
guests, and
62
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 21
Traveler
|
OP
Traveler
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 21 |
|
|
|
.
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 21
Traveler
|
OP
Traveler
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 21 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,597
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,597 |
Pure rubbish. There are no models that have any validity that far out in time.
Walker Mangum Cow Wreck Beach, Anegada
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,180
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,180 |
wmangum said: Pure rubbish. There are no models that have any validity that far out in time. While I see your point, why would they waste the MIPS to run them that far out? Worst case scenario? Or?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,597
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,597 |
MIPs are more or less free these days.
Models might be good for long-term meso-scale trends, but no model can predict a week ahead with any semblance of reliability something as chaotic as birth and development of a storm.
Even after a tropical disturbance begins, none of the models can predict anything more than a 2 or 3 days ahead with any accuracy.
"Four" was an excellent example. It apparently had no internet connection and failed to read the predictions of what it was supposed to do.
Walker Mangum Cow Wreck Beach, Anegada
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,180
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,180 |
you didn't really answer my question, though...why run the models so far out then?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,597
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,597 |
Because they can. They could let the model run forever into the future if they wanted to. They probably do give some indication global-scale trends at 7 days. They also give some guidance about tracks of existing storms as far as 7 days out - the farther out, the less accurate.
But predicting the origin and track of a non-existent storm 7 days in the future is totally meaningless.
Walker Mangum Cow Wreck Beach, Anegada
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 945
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 945 |
PERHAPS: Running the model out so far will ONEDAY result in a human saying; "Used to be the models were never accurate out to 5(6 or 7) days, but recently with advances in models, we NOW see that the MIP is resulting in some accuracy ".
Not there yet. Maybe some day!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 308
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 308 |
wmangum said:"Four" was an excellent example. It apparently had no internet connection and failed to read the predictions of what it was supposed to do. Well said!
|
|
|
|
|
|