|
Forums39
Topics39,566
Posts320,889
Members26,686
| |
Most Online4,031
Dec 15th, 2024
|
|
|
candj
Southport, North Carolina, US
Posts: 2,114
Joined: December 2008
|
|
|
9 members (Sunfun, MrEZgoin, mark37, Todd, SXMScubaman, alecu7, Lionsail, marybeth, 1 invisible),
1,558
guests, and
63
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,123 Likes: 2
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,123 Likes: 2 |
How about taking the public side out of the equation and put those curved deflectors on the airport side of the fence to send the exhaust upward instead of towards the beach.
They are not that high and do the trick or at least minimize the blast. If a plane lands THAT short it will kill all those on the fence anyway.
|
|
|
 .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 355
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 355 |
If warning signs do not deter jerks from staying away from the fence? they need do nothing.... There will always be thrill seekers, hopefully getting this out through the news media will at least put a thought in stupid people for doing this... I know for sure this was on news media in the states and on facebook... Other than that, the Island can do nothing... and have no reason too... Do at your own risk should be there... lol
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83,993 Likes: 4
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83,993 Likes: 4 |
The issue at that point is damaging the PLANE and those onboard, not the people on the ground.
Carol Hill
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,123 Likes: 2
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,123 Likes: 2 |
They are in use in many airports to deflect jet exhaust from sensitive areas both environmental and structural. Just thought they might work here.
Last edited by boucharda; 07/17/2017 02:15 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 215
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 215 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83,993 Likes: 4
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83,993 Likes: 4 |
The problem with them in SXM is because the runway is so tight already and a solid barrier would leave even less margin for error.
Carol Hill
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,000
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,000 |
The deflecting barrier could be made of wood which would shatter if hit by a plane and not have any more risk than the existing chain link fences.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,123 Likes: 2
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,123 Likes: 2 |
They are actually made out of a plastic-like composite that does exactly as you suggest.and they are maybe four or so feet high...definitely not a landing issue
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83,993 Likes: 4
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83,993 Likes: 4 |
The ones that I have seen are MUCH taller than that. I don't see how a four foot tall wall would do any good?
Carol Hill
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,123 Likes: 2
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,123 Likes: 2 |
Correct...it was a low off the cuff estimate...the normal height is 8 feet which is approximately the height of the present fence. The barrier itself is easily broken into fragments if it is struck.
Point being it would remove the attraction for anyone to hang on the fence AND remove the sand/object blasting issues from those on the beach and make the area a place just for watching planes land.
Last edited by boucharda; 07/17/2017 10:40 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 185
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 185 |
unfortunately there's no law against stupidity.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 733 Likes: 1
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 733 Likes: 1 |
Why don't we just leave things the way they are and let the idiots continue. They are only hurting themselves. <img src="http://www.traveltalkonline.com/forums/images/graemlins/thinks.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,844 Likes: 2
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,844 Likes: 2 |
The process of natural selection works pretty well when allowed without intervention.
J.D.
|
|
|
|
|
.
