Forums39
Topics40,276
Posts326,609
Members26,829
|
Most Online4,031 Dec 15th, 2024
|
|
Posts: 1,273
Joined: May 2007
|
|
10 members (Kevin_B, maineskier69, Good Boy Gus, charlie, Eva, hokiesailor, 4 invisible),
367
guests, and
56
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 20,030 Likes: 38
Traveler
|
OP
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 20,030 Likes: 38 |
|
|
|
.
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,621 Likes: 38
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,621 Likes: 38 |
Saw that earlier today. As of now, AA still has the Max 8 on it's schedule in May from Miami...
Carol Hill
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,606 Likes: 5
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,606 Likes: 5 |
Our late March and mid-April AA flights have changed twice now (domestic, not SXM). They're definitely moving planes around.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,288
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,288 |
https://youtu.be/H2tuKiiznsYGreat video showing the origins of why the 737-Max has the MCAS and issues it does. It was a race against the Airbus A320 Neo. Basically, if the 737 had taller landing gear it would have been easy to put the same fuel efficient engines the Airbus was adding, but it didnt and had to put the engines nearly above the wings for clearance. This is probably a great airplane I have flown on. It just needs a throrough reproving of its airworthiness and no one will/should take any chances in mitigating and identified risk within the design team. Failure to do so would lead to doubt and any incident might be dooming to the company. Its going to suck at BAC for awhile but they have to get it right beyond a doubt.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 415
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 415 |
https://youtu.be/H2tuKiiznsYGreat video showing the origins of why the 737-Max has the MCAS and issues it does. It was a race against the Airbus A320 Neo. Basically, if the 737 had taller landing gear it would have been easy to put the same fuel efficient engines the Airbus was adding, but it didnt and had to put the engines nearly above the wings for clearance. This is probably a great airplane I have flown on. It just needs a throrough reproving of its airworthiness and no one will/should take any chances in mitigating and identified risk within the design team. Failure to do so would lead to doubt and any incident might be dooming to the company. Its going to suck at BAC for awhile but they have to get it right beyond a doubt. Interesting Video, Thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 119
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 119 |
Expect further delays. It has been now recommended that pilots should train on 737max800 simulators first. Problem is there are very few available, so more need to be built.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 20,030 Likes: 38
Traveler
|
OP
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 20,030 Likes: 38 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 50
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 50 |
To PelicanPirate's comment about the landing gear. Not only did Boeing have to reposition the engines by moving them up and forward they in fact did lengthen the landing gears as well.
Last edited by fritzks; 01/08/2020 09:19 AM.
|
|
|
|
|