According to Marty's posting a few weeks ago, Alegria was attempting to evict him for a second time, on the basis of non conformity to the terms of his lease. There were 4 claims:
1. Non Payment of Rent
2. Operating without a License
3. No Liability Insurance
4. Nuisance to Hotel Guests.
As far as what the actually wording of the ruling from today was? He did not quote it. Only stated that he won.
I'm sure this is not the end of it, Alegria will try again...and will probably fail.
.
